Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 19:36:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 19:36:15 -0400 Received: from samba.sourceforge.net ([198.186.203.85]:32468 "HELO lists.samba.org") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 19:36:14 -0400 From: Rusty Russell To: Kai Germaschewski Cc: Roman Zippel , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] automatic module_init ordering In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 31 Jul 2002 12:06:52 EST." Date: Thu, 01 Aug 2002 09:28:19 +1000 Message-Id: <20020731234108.36C064D62@lists.samba.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1251 Lines: 32 In message y ou write: > On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Rusty Russell wrote: > > > My PARAM code actually maps - to _ in parameter parsing, for exactly > > this reason. And only a complete idiot would put , in a module name, > > so I don't care 8) > > Tell that to the author of 53c7,8xx.o ;) Consider that done. > > As it happens, the configuration doesn't allow more than one to be > > built in (they can all be modules though), so it's not actually a > > problem even after parameter unification. > > Hmmh, I think that'll need some testing. It will be fine if only one of > the three is "y", the others being "n/undef". However, it looks like it's > possible to have sth like "m/m/y", which would go wrong with the current > approach. That's a bug. That configuration makes no sense (the modules won't load). Hmmm... more Config.in complexity coming up 8( Rusty. -- Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot. -- Rusty Russell. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/