Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 23:21:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 23:21:45 -0400 Received: from saturn.cs.uml.edu ([129.63.8.2]:32787 "EHLO saturn.cs.uml.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 31 Jul 2002 23:21:44 -0400 From: "Albert D. Cahalan" Message-Id: <200208010325.g713PAA340197@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Subject: Re: [2.6] The List, pass #2 To: roland@topspin.com (Roland Dreier) Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 23:25:10 -0400 (EDT) Cc: acahalan@cs.uml.edu (Albert D. Cahalan), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <52vg6vwbrw.fsf@topspin.com> from "Roland Dreier" at Jul 31, 2002 07:30:59 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1094 Lines: 28 Roland Dreier writes: > >>>>> "Albert" == Albert D Cahalan writes: B > Guillaume> Definitely 2.7: > Guillaume> o InfiniBand support > > Albert> Why? > > Albert> Sure, one could get fancy, but just running SCSI or IP > Albert> over InfiniBand can't be that complicated... hmmm? > > Look at http://infiniband.sf.net to see all the infrastructure > required just to get to the point of being able to start to write an > IP-over-IB driver. As I said, "one could get fancy", thus missing the 2.6.xx kernel. It's pretty obvious that you could do SCSI and IP with much less code. What's with the "HCA DDK" anyway, UDI reborn? I see all sorts of layers for IPC and what looks like VI/VIA, etc. Ditch the lofty goals, and you might make the 2.6.xx kernel. You can stick to being a FireWire alternative for now. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/