Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756355Ab1FTWdk (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:33:40 -0400 Received: from e3.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.143]:53980 "EHLO e3.ny.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755338Ab1FTWdi (ORCPT ); Mon, 20 Jun 2011 18:33:38 -0400 Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 15:16:42 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Stefan Seyfried Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [3.0-rc3] tree RCU boost vs hang notifier... Message-ID: <20110620221642.GD2933@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com References: <20110614045150.GA2264@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110614124048.GB2264@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 889 Lines: 25 On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:44:02AM +0000, Stefan Seyfried wrote: > On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:40:48 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 01:46:04PM +0800, Daniel J Blueman wrote: > >> Tested-by: Daniel J Blueman > > > > Thank you very much for testing this! > > Hi Paul, > > Will this also fix the constant system load of 1.0 or is this a different > issue? (If it was, I'd need to report it properly ;) Hello, Stefan, Yes, it should also reduce the system load, given that the load calculations count tasks sleeping uninteruptably but not tasks sleeping interruptably. Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/