Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 01:05:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 01:05:25 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:61962 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 01:05:24 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: torvalds@transmeta.com (Linus Torvalds) Subject: Re: [2.6] The List, pass #2 Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 05:08:41 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Transmeta Corporation Message-ID: References: <3D3761A9.23960.8EB1A2@localhost> <200208010156.g711uMc340112@saturn.cs.uml.edu> X-Trace: palladium.transmeta.com 1028178513 12279 127.0.0.1 (1 Aug 2002 05:08:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@transmeta.com NNTP-Posting-Date: 1 Aug 2002 05:08:33 GMT Cache-Post-Path: palladium.transmeta.com!unknown@penguin.transmeta.com X-Cache: nntpcache 2.4.0b5 (see http://www.nntpcache.org/) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 757 Lines: 23 In article <200208010156.g711uMc340112@saturn.cs.uml.edu>, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: >Guillaume Boissier writes: > >> Definitely 2.7: >> >> o InfiniBand support > >Why? It's big, it's complex, and nobody seems to take it that seriously (the only people who ever asked _me_ about it was Intel, and they seem to have cancelled their own projects). If it turns out to be a big hit, it can be backported. But as it looks now, it has very little relevance for any 2.6 freeze schedule. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/