Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 04:06:45 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 04:06:45 -0400 Received: from ns.virtualhost.dk ([195.184.98.160]:29162 "EHLO virtualhost.dk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 04:06:44 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 10:10:10 +0200 From: Jens Axboe To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: lkml , Andrew Morton Subject: Re: Linux v2.4.19-rc5 Message-ID: <20020801081010.GA1096@suse.de> References: <20020801074953.GJ1644@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1202 Lines: 36 On Thu, Aug 01 2002, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Jens Axboe wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 01 2002, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > (02/08/01 1.663) > > > [PATCH] disable READA > > > > Since -rc5 is not to be found yet, I don't know what version of this > > made it in. Is READA just being disabled on SMP, or was it the general > > #if 0 change that got included? > > Its being disabled on UP and SMP. I dont like having such readahead IO > mode working only for UP. You are right, that would be ugly. Should only be the last resort. > > I'm asking since plain disabling READA might have nasty performance > > effects. Andrew, I bet you did some numbers on this, care to share? > > If thats true (the performance effects) I'll release -final with IMO not > very coherent READA semantics :) > > Anyway, lets wait for the numbers. It just 'feels' like the sort of change that might have odd side effects. -- Jens Axboe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/