Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 04:46:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 04:46:31 -0400 Received: from [217.167.51.129] ([217.167.51.129]:496 "EHLO zion.wanadoo.fr") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 04:46:30 -0400 From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: "Albert D. Cahalan" , Lincoln Dale Cc: David Luyer , "'Alan Cox'" , Subject: Re: Linux 2.4.19ac3rc3 on IBM x330/x340 SMP - "ps" time skew Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 10:49:19 +0200 Message-Id: <20020801084920.15476@192.168.4.1> In-Reply-To: <200208010133.g711Xq7338295@saturn.cs.uml.edu> References: <200208010133.g711Xq7338295@saturn.cs.uml.edu> X-Mailer: CTM PowerMail 3.1.2 F MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1035 Lines: 29 >2.2.xx i386 as shipped by Linus >2.4.xx i386 with HZ modified > >Come on, write the code if you think it's so easy. >You get bonus points for supporting 2.0.xx kernels >and the IA-64 kernel with that same executable. > >Maybe you think I should tell these people to go to Hell? >In that case, what about the Alpha systems that ran HZ at >1200 instead of 1024? Isn't HZ value passed down to userland via the ELF aux table ? (At least the "userland visible" one, which isn't the kernel internal one in recent 2.5's, oh well...) That's a reason I don't understand why Linus did this separation between "userland visibl" HZ and kernel internal HZ. I would have just changed the kernel HZ and let userland be fixed to use the value passed via the aux table instead of hard coding it. Ben. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/