Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 05:30:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 05:30:11 -0400 Received: from mail.webmaster.com ([216.152.64.131]:53998 "EHLO shell.webmaster.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 05:30:09 -0400 From: David Schwartz To: , CC: Christoph Hellwig , Bill Davidsen , Guillaume Boissiere , X-Mailer: PocoMail 2.61 (1055) - Licensed Version Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 02:33:33 -0700 In-Reply-To: <1028161904.13048.20.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: [2.6] The List, pass #2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-ID: <20020801093335.AAA7575@shell.webmaster.com@whenever> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 739 Lines: 18 >An additional problem with a BSD like license is that it makes no >statement on patents - regrettably a critical issue now days in the >USSA. That means nothing prevents CITI from providing BSD licensed code >and then 6 months later sueing everyone who used it. I don't see CITI >doing that but the basic problem is still there. Sure something prevents them. You can't induce people to violate your patent and then complain when they do what you induced them to do. Remember Rambus? DS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/