Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757924Ab1FVCmh (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:42:37 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59351 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757816Ab1FVCmg (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:42:36 -0400 Message-ID: <4E015672.2020407@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:41:54 +0800 From: Cong Wang User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc14 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mel Gorman CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Andrea Arcangeli , Mel Gorman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Rik van Riel , Johannes Weiner , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm: make the threshold of enabling THP configurable References: <1308587683-2555-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <1308587683-2555-2-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> <20110620165955.GB9396@suse.de> <4DFF8050.9070201@redhat.com> <20110621093640.GD9396@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20110621093640.GD9396@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1371 Lines: 29 于 2011年06月21日 17:36, Mel Gorman 写道: > > Fragmentation avoidance benefits from tuning min_free_kbytes to a higher > value and minimising fragmentation-related problems is crucial if THP is > to allocate its necessary pages. > > THP tunes min_free_kbytes automatically and this value is in part > related to the number of zones. At 512M on a single node machine, the > recommended min_free_kbytes is close to 10% of memory which is barely > tolerable as it is. At 256M, it's 17%, at 128M, it's 34% so tuning the > value lower has diminishing returns as the performance impact of giving > up such a high percentage of free memory is not going to be offset by > reduced TLB misses. Tuning it to a higher value might make some sense > if the higher min_free_kbytes was a problem but it would be much more > rational to tune it as a sysctl than making it a compile-time decision. > What this patch changed is the check of total memory pages in hugepage_init(), which I don't think is suitable as a sysctl. If you mean min_free_kbytes could be tuned as a sysctl, that should be done in other patch, right? :) Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/