Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754587Ab1FVIiB (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 04:38:01 -0400 Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:58593 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754367Ab1FVIh5 convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 04:37:57 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=nkv154YLlW2kHGsPLWezSlCssL44LQAFYwKMNL27rKBrnUEca3Z99xWE7qtBu9e8+8 3KWl8RoH4bOUfIk8FFGTqoV1zibF6VjfJM7g/aPjFC2x9GwuCP3DYviToBWl1HAUttU3 GLgBorN9akaAgGewhwb52zyS1aRLRR8GvUrZs= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4E018CE3.7070101@snapgear.com> References: <20110622111256.3857df1e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <4E018CE3.7070101@snapgear.com> Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:29:41 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: k1BHIlMX7B5oXnIA09VBPOWNTbk Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k tree From: Geert Uytterhoeven To: Greg Ungerer Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Linux/m68k" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1628 Lines: 42 Hi Greg, Stephen, On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:34, Greg Ungerer wrote: > On 22/06/11 11:12, Stephen Rothwell wrote: >> Today's linux-next merge of the m68knommu tree got a conflict in >> arch/m68k/include/asm/bitops_mm.h between commit 17c74432b88e >> ("m68k/bitops: Make bitmap data pointer of atomic ops volatile") from the >> m68k tree and commit 2cb0d89e66b1 ("m68k: merge mmu and non-mmu >> bitops.h") from the m68knommu tree. >> >> The latter effectively deletes in the file and in doing the merge, >> removes the funtions that were modified by the former commit.  So I just >> removed the file. > > That would be right. The changes that Geert's patch makes are in > my merge patch. Sorry, I forgot that Greg was merging them, which also fixes the issue we had on m68k. [mental note to self: check for merge conflicts with m68knommu before updating for-next] > Geert: do you want me to hold of on merging the bitops.h files? No, it looks fine to me. Feel free to add my Acked-by. Gr{oetje,eeting}s,                         Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.                                 -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/