Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 08:52:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 08:52:39 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:4335 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 08:52:38 -0400 Subject: Re: [2.6] The List, pass #2 From: Alan Cox To: "Albert D. Cahalan" Cc: Guillaume Boissiere , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200208010156.g711uMc340112@saturn.cs.uml.edu> References: <200208010156.g711uMc340112@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 01 Aug 2002 15:12:58 +0100 Message-Id: <1028211178.14871.34.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 820 Lines: 24 On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 02:56, Albert D. Cahalan wrote: > Guillaume Boissier writes: > > > Definitely 2.7: > > > > o InfiniBand support > > Why? > > Sure, one could get fancy, but just running SCSI or IP > over InfiniBand can't be that complicated... hmmm? Intel canned their hardware, Microsoft apparently canned support in their upcoming product short term, nobody has a ready to go stack. SCSI over infiniband should work nicely with little work. IP over infiniband is a bit more complicated, at least until they actually implement the congestion control in the fabric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/