Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758765Ab1FVSrD (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:47:03 -0400 Received: from oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com ([67.222.55.9]:39573 "HELO oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1758746Ab1FVSqt (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Jun 2011 14:46:49 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=xenotime.net; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References:Organization:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=NKJh+8zZPfg7drfiD7DvTlBy6uHpHghligt8XY+jgoaGFQsZerOK4Zi+OeVvRfnePNi7nKQQACV6HkICsVNzvn6TRZ/5VWCXIpmPn4+8A7MASgx6XX5gRlhpxZvZ7p5p; Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2011 11:46:47 -0700 From: Randy Dunlap To: Mark Brown Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Samuel Ortiz , Margarita Olaya , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mfd: tps65912 needs MFD_CORE Message-Id: <20110622114647.0e8c1ec7.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <20110622182915.GA13847@sirena.org.uk> References: <20110622163651.7ebc407c.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110622100615.c79765ff.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> <20110622182915.GA13847@sirena.org.uk> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.6; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {1807:box742.bluehost.com:xenotime:xenotime.net} {sentby:smtp auth 50.53.38.135 authed with rdunlap@xenotime.net} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1050 Lines: 26 On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 19:29:15 +0100 Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 10:06:15AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > From: Randy Dunlap > > > > MFD_TPS65912 should select MFD_CORE so that mfd interfaces are > > available to it. This fixes a build error when MFD_CORE=m and > > MFD_TPS65912=y (and no other TPS65912 kconfig symbols are enabled, > > so no other select MFD_CORE was done). > > I posted a better patch for this earlier today - the bigger problem here > is that as with other MFD cores MFD_TPS65912 shouldn't be directly > selectable at all as it can't do anything useful without a bus > interface. Good. Hopefully such a kconfig won't be possible in the future then. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/