Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933703Ab1FWUCW (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:02:22 -0400 Received: from mail-pv0-f174.google.com ([74.125.83.174]:56272 "EHLO mail-pv0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932670Ab1FWUCT (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Jun 2011 16:02:19 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=yCqqDviPjZC0VLpRh2yKJNlM35UQz8844MPEaR6TU9Cm8Lcd366YXTHY5xaQjP5H7W YsmZkAiP04ViN4bbtm8khDxr24iEs/BiP1XjAdUxcLnhLz8ORR2eUnYgeAfL+/iI2occ BWfYhKDOxkyru+yHFMmWWyrYiPlCdxtBT02lM= Message-ID: <4E039BC7.4050802@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:02:15 -0600 From: David Ahern User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110428 Fedora/3.1.10-1.fc15 Thunderbird/3.1.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Arun Sharma CC: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Using a new perf tool against an older kernel References: <4E026123.4060208@fb.com> <4E034C2C.30509@gmail.com> <4E03968A.5010008@fb.com> In-Reply-To: <4E03968A.5010008@fb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1150 Lines: 40 On 06/23/2011 01:39 PM, Arun Sharma wrote: > On 6/23/11 7:22 AM, David Ahern wrote: > >> I have not seen issues like this using newer perf userspace against >> older kernels. For example, my laptop was running Fedora 14 (2.6.35) and >> now Fedora 15 (2.6.38.8) and I typically use latest perf builds (e.g., >> testing patches). > > I narrowed it down to PERF_SAMPLE_RAW: > > perf record -ag -- sleep 1 > > is fine, but: > > perf record -agR -- sleep 1 > > fails for me most of the time. The reason I needed to use the -R in the > first place is that "perf script" fails on older kernels with: > > Samples do not contain timestamps. > > With the newer perf, I don't get errors, but the timestamp field is > invalid. So I need to use the -R flag to get valid timestamps + > stacktraces out of "perf script". That should have been fixed. And -T on record gets the timestamps. David > > -Arun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/