Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 16:27:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 16:27:09 -0400 Received: from pc2-cwma1-5-cust12.swa.cable.ntl.com ([80.5.121.12]:26353 "EHLO irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 16:27:09 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH] 2.5.29 IDE 110 From: Alan Cox To: martin@dalecki.de Cc: Petr Vandrovec , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <3D499862.6070305@evision.ag> References: <3D499862.6070305@evision.ag> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-6) Date: 01 Aug 2002 22:47:07 +0100 Message-Id: <1028238427.14871.95.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 741 Lines: 16 On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 21:21, Marcin Dalecki wrote: > Maybe not a loop device? But how about handling this at partition scan > time then? Partitions are after all nothing else then devices > with remapped sectors in first place. Could you manage to insert > at the proper place in paritions/*.c the magical + 1. > It could then be turned in no instant in to a global kernel > option - whch it what it is after all. Is there any reason this can't be dumped on LVM2 and/or EVMS whichever gets in ? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/