Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 17:05:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 17:05:42 -0400 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:65526 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 17:05:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 17:08:50 -0400 (EDT) From: Alexander Viro To: Thunder from the hill cc: Peter Chubb , Pavel Machek , Matt_Domsch@Dell.com, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.28 and partitions In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 899 Lines: 25 On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Thunder from the hill wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Alexander Viro wrote: > > More powerful? > > Well, compared to ASCII: it's unlikely that you meet a j letter or a \033 > in the size string. Huh??? That's a new meaning of "powerful"... If you mean "more compact" I would certainly agree (base-10 instead of base-256), but if _that_ becomes a problem with partition tables... IIRC, OP proposed 4096 bytes for table. Again, if somebody really can't check if array of characters is a valid representation of integer or can't implement conversion of known valid one to its value... What the devil are you doing here? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/