Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 17:38:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 17:38:25 -0400 Received: from leibniz.math.psu.edu ([146.186.130.2]:32163 "EHLO math.psu.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 17:38:25 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 17:41:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Alexander Viro To: martin@dalecki.de cc: Thunder from the hill , Peter Chubb , Pavel Machek , Matt_Domsch@Dell.com, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.5.28 and partitions In-Reply-To: <3D49A75D.801@evision.ag> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 805 Lines: 25 On Thu, 1 Aug 2002, Marcin Dalecki wrote: > Ahh. we are at "devil" arguemnt level... So I will ease myself: > Why the hell don't you rewrite the whole kernel for example in LISP if > you love string processing that much? Huh? What the does LISP have to strings? > I know I know GCC people tryed this in C for a compiler... gcc people tried a lot of crap in a lot of ways for a lot of reasons, but a) I'm not sure I've parsed your sentence correctly b) I don't see what the flaming fsck does it have to _anything_ discussed above. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/