Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755706Ab1FZWEM (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:04:12 -0400 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:38063 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755568Ab1FZWCn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jun 2011 18:02:43 -0400 Subject: Re: [Bug #38292] slab vs lockdep vs debugobjects From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Maciej Rutecki , Florian Mickler In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:01:48 +0200 Message-ID: <1309125708.4756.1.camel@twins> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 615 Lines: 14 On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 23:23 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.39. Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team > know (either way). who said its a regression? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/