Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 00:31:34 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
        Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>,
        Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>
Subject: Re: [Bug #38292] slab vs lockdep vs debugobjects
Message-ID: <20110626223134.GA24843@elte.hu>
References: <VDRaLpg_NZ.A.tnC.JZ6BOB@chimera>
 <XWjMN7gBoXK.A.1zC.RZ6BOB@chimera>
 <1309125708.4756.1.camel@twins>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1309125708.4756.1.camel@twins>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 869
Lines: 26


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 23:23 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the tracking team
> > know (either way).
> 
> who said its a regression?

I suspect Rafael saw your mail to lkml with a nasty looking lockdep 
message in it and assumed it was a new one?

Instead it's one that always had the chance to trigger?

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/