Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 18:50:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 18:50:35 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:40975 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 1 Aug 2002 18:50:33 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 19:53:45 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Paolo Ciarrocchi cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: dbench In-Reply-To: <20020801160723.13724.qmail@linuxmail.org> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 645 Lines: 23 On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Paolo Ciarrocchi wrote: > I performed a test running dbench. Why ? I hope you realise that dbench doesn't really show anything about how a kernel reacts to real world performance and is mostly useful as a stress test or for measuring lock contention. regards, Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/