Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932124Ab1F0KWa (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2011 06:22:30 -0400 Received: from webbox687.server-home.net ([195.149.74.151]:57823 "EHLO webbox687.server-home.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756536Ab1F0KUx (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jun 2011 06:20:53 -0400 From: Alexander Stein To: Fenghua Yu Subject: coretemp: Support for Intel Atom E6XX CPU (TunnelCreek)? Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 12:20:51 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/2.6.38-gentoo-r6; KDE/4.6.3; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Jean Delvare , Guenter Roeck , lm-sensors@lm-sensors.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201106271220.51953.alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 881 Lines: 20 Hello, I have a patch (for v2.6.39) which adds support for Intel Atom E6XX (TunnelCreek) to coretemp. It's merely only adding x86_model 0x26. But there are models (e.g. E660 and E660T) with different TjMax, namely 90 degrees C and 110 degrees C. But these different model can't be detected by reading from hardware. IMO there should be some support to adjust the temperature from userspace. Reading Documentation/hwmon/sysfs-interface only temp1_offset seems to be useable. But I think it is somewhat misleading (especially on multicores), because there must only be one offset. What do you think about this? Regards, Alexander -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/