Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 17:53:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 17:53:30 -0500 Received: from penguin.e-mind.com ([195.223.140.120]:25444 "EHLO penguin.e-mind.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 17:53:20 -0500 Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 23:22:33 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli To: Jesse Pollard Cc: Ulrich Drepper , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.or" Subject: Re: 2.2.18 signal.h Message-ID: <20001215232233.A21753@inspiron.random> In-Reply-To: <200012152156.PAA137696@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200012152156.PAA137696@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil>; from pollard@tomcat.admin.navo.hpc.mil on Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 03:56:52PM -0600 X-GnuPG-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.gnupg.asc X-PGP-Key-URL: http://e-mind.com/~andrea/aa.asc Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 03:56:52PM -0600, Jesse Pollard wrote: > [..] A null expression, specified with > the ";" is a small price to pay for simplifying the error detection. [..] I'm not convinced this is a significant simplification (also considering the "hard" way is just working fine). I think it's only to be compliant with the standard and despite me not liking having to duplicate even more information in the sources, that's a good thing. Andrea - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/