Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 02:34:00 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 02:34:00 -0400 Received: from www.transvirtual.com ([206.14.214.140]:32523 "EHLO www.transvirtual.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 02:33:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 23:37:12 -0700 (PDT) From: James Simmons To: Douglas Gilbert cc: Banai Zoltan , Subject: Re: Linux 2.5.30 In-Reply-To: <3D49E238.64B48408@torque.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1243 Lines: 31 > On Thu, Aug 01, 2002 at 08:12:34PM -0400, Alexander Viro wrote: > > > > > > Argh. My fault - it's devfs-only code and it didn't get tested ;-/ > > > > > > Fix: replace line 470 with > > > p[part].de = NULL; > > > > > Thanks, that help! > > > > But it does not boot,( nor does 2.5.24) > > with 2.5.30 it panics at PNP BIOS initalisation, > > without PNPBIOS it freezes after loop device init(no network card) > > after network card init if configured (Intel e100). > > No SysRq helps.:( > > Banai, > Yep, the anti-devfs regime broke it a few versions ago > with console/tty (serial) driver changes. It sort of defeats > the purpose, but I can boot with "devfs=nomount" as a > kernel boot up option. [This worked in lk 2.5.29] I have nothing against devfs. In fact I spent the morning attempting to get my machine to use devfs. I discovered that was harding than I thoyght which is why I asked people to test my patch out. I think I'm going to just send it into linus soon anyways. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/