Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751911Ab1F2E3E (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:29:04 -0400 Received: from e32.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.150]:46818 "EHLO e32.co.us.ibm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751322Ab1F2E3A (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2011 00:29:00 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH V7 2/4 net-next] skbuff: Add userspace zero-copy buffers in skb From: Shirley Ma To: David Miller Cc: mst@redhat.com, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, avi@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20110628.163508.222352070705159851.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1309189510.21764.1.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20110627.155426.51839633424542723.davem@davemloft.net> <1309279892.3559.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20110628.163508.222352070705159851.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:28:54 -0700 Message-ID: <1309321734.3559.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 (2.28.3-1.fc12) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1646 Lines: 50 I have submitted this patchset from Version 1 to Version 7 already in the past few months. Here is the link to the patchset: http://lists.openwall.net/netdev/2011/05/28/ I am working on V8 now. Thanks Shirley On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 16:35 -0700, David Miller wrote: > From: Shirley Ma > Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:51:32 -0700 > > > On Mon, 2011-06-27 at 15:54 -0700, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Shirley Ma > >> Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2011 08:45:10 -0700 > >> > >> > To support skb zero-copy, a pointer is needed to add to skb share > >> info. > >> > Do you agree with this approach? If not, do you have any other > >> > suggestions? > >> > >> I really can't form an opinion unless I am shown the complete > >> implementation, what this give us in return, what the impact is, > etc. > .. > > You can see the overall CPU saved 50% w/i zero-copy. > > > > The impact is every skb allocation consumed one more pointer in skb > > share info, and a pointer check in skb release when last reference > is > > gone. > > > > For skb clone, skb expand private head and skb copy, it still keeps > copy > > the buffers to kernel, so we can avoid user application, like > tcpdump to > > hold the user-space buffers too long. > > Ok, now show me the "complete implementation". I'm as interested in > the code as I am in the numbers, that's why I asked for both. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/