Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754144Ab1F2RYm (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:24:42 -0400 Received: from bedivere.hansenpartnership.com ([66.63.167.143]:47645 "EHLO bedivere.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751889Ab1F2RYl (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2011 13:24:41 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] Fix various section mismatches and build errors. From: James Bottomley To: Ralf Baechle Cc: Greg KH , David Miller , akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@linux.intel.com, bcasavan@sgi.com, airlied@linux.ie, grundler@parisc-linux.org, perex@perex.cz, rpurdie@rpsys.net, klassert@mathematik.tu-chemnitz.de, tj@kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20110629161921.GA25833@linux-mips.org> References: <17dd5038b15d7135791aadbe80464a13c80758d3.1309182742.git.ralf@linux-mips.org> <20110627.221257.1290251511587162468.davem@davemloft.net> <20110629130711.GA15649@linux-mips.org> <1309355899.2551.4.camel@mulgrave> <20110629151424.GD18023@kroah.com> <20110629161921.GA25833@linux-mips.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 12:24:36 -0500 Message-ID: <1309368276.13937.2.camel@mulgrave> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.2 (2.32.2-1.fc14) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1326 Lines: 32 On Wed, 2011-06-29 at 17:19 +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:14:24AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:58:19AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > > I think we should simply concentrate on __init and __exit; that's where > > > most of the discard value lies and stop expending huge efforts on the > > > __devX stuff which adds huge complexity for no real gain. > > > > I have long felt that those __devX markings should just go away as they > > cause nothing but problems and have no real gain as you point out. > > The suggestion to do that has been floated around before but seems to > have missed sufficient thrust. I'm all for it; the manual tagging with > __devX has not been very efficient on developer time. I just want to see > meaningful warnings again over all that noise the current mechanisn may > produce. For me, just go ahead and fix the actual problems: so _init sections and _exit sections that are used from the main body, just strip the annotations, don't try to change them for _devX ones. Thanks, James -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/