Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757995Ab1F2Vam (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:30:42 -0400 Received: from mail1.slb.deg.dub.stisp.net ([84.203.253.98]:8910 "HELO mail1.slb.deg.dub.stisp.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1757529Ab1F2Vai (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Jun 2011 17:30:38 -0400 Message-ID: <4E0B9955.3040905@draigBrady.com> Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:29:57 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?P=E1draig_Brady?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sunil Mushran CC: Christoph Hellwig , Dave Chinner , Josef Bacik , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests 255: add a seek_data/seek_hole tester References: <1309275199-10801-1-git-send-email-josef@redhat.com> <1309275199-10801-5-git-send-email-josef@redhat.com> <20110629065306.GC1026@dastard> <20110629074021.GA26086@infradead.org> <4E0B019E.8080800@draigBrady.com> <4E0B60DE.50908@oracle.com> In-Reply-To: <4E0B60DE.50908@oracle.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1758 Lines: 40 On 29/06/11 18:29, Sunil Mushran wrote: > On 06/29/2011 03:42 AM, P?draig Brady wrote: >> There is the argument, that if this interface can distinguish >> these dirty unwritten extents, then why can't the fiemap interface too? >> The advantage of the fiemap interface is that it can distinguish >> empty extents vs holes. Empty extents will become increasingly common >> I think, given the fragmentation and space guarantee benefits they give. >> It would be cool for cp for example to be able to efficiently copy >> empty extents from source to dest. > > I'm not too sure about that. Atleast not enabled by default. Most users > use cp to backup data. Not empty space. In this case, this empty extent > may not even be de-dupable. That's a fair point. On the other hand if you wanted to start working with the backup copy, you might want it allocated to avoid fragmentation and ENOSPC issues. What we were going with was empty -> hole with cp --sparse=always and empty -> empty otherwise. If empty and hole can not be distinguished though, then this process will be impacted. > > Frankly I'd be happier of cp started to exploited fallocate() to create > larger > extents before copying data into them. Atleast for the large files. Yes we definitely will start doing that. That will help fragmentation and give early ENOSPC. We can't use fiemap for this at the moment (on XSF or ext4 (without a sync)) but the seek_data interface should allow us to do this to some extent (pardon the pun). cheers, P?draig. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/