Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 08:49:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 08:49:27 -0400 Received: from mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net ([167.206.5.10]:40919 "EHLO mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 08:49:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2002 08:52:04 -0400 From: Nick Orlov Subject: Re: [PATCH] pdc20265 problem. In-reply-to: <1028291245.18317.15.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> To: lkml Mail-followup-to: lkml Message-id: <20020802125204.GA4729@nikolas.hn.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i References: <20020802014728.GA796@nikolas.hn.org> <1028291245.18317.15.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 995 Lines: 27 On Fri, Aug 02, 2002 at 01:27:25PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote: > On Fri, 2002-08-02 at 02:47, Nick Orlov wrote: > > > > > (02/07/19 1.646) > > > Fix wrong #ifdef in ide-pci.c: Was causing problems with FastTrak > > > > Because of this fix my Promise 20265 became ide0 instead of ide2. > > Is there any reason to mark pdc20265 as ON_BOARD controller? > > How about because it can be and it should be checked. I don't know what > is going on with the ifdef in your case to cause this but its not as > simple as it seems Why pdc20265 is so special ? All other Promises marked as OFF_BOARD... And what determines how id will be assigned to controllers if both of them are ON_BOARD ? -- With best wishes, Nick Orlov. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/