Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S129183AbQLPArU>; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 19:47:20 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S129370AbQLPArA>; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 19:47:00 -0500
Received: from gw2-int.ensim.com ([38.186.181.2]:53243 "EHLO
	nasdaq.ms.ensim.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S129183AbQLPAqs>; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 19:46:48 -0500
From: Borislav Deianov <borislav@ensim.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 16:16:21 -0800
To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: recommended build environment
Message-ID: <20001215161621.A7600@aero.ensim.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

In article <E146jNL-0000SN-00@the-village.bc.nu> you wrote:
>> > o	We tell vendors to build RPMv3 , glibc 2.1.x
>> Curious HOW do you tell vendors??

> When they ask. More usefully Dan Quinlann and most vendors put together a
> recommended set of things to build with and use. It warns about library
> pitfalls, kernel changes and what packaging is supported. It is far from
> perfect and nothing like the LSB goals but its a start and following it does
> give you applications that with a bit of care run on everything.

Is that recommendation available online anywhere? What about RedHat's?
If not, who do I email for a copy in each case?

Thanks,
Borislav

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/