Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 11:31:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 11:31:20 -0400 Received: from ns.suse.de ([213.95.15.193]:49932 "EHLO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 11:31:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 17:34:49 +0200 From: Dave Jones To: gerg Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH]: linux-2.5.30uc0 MMU-less patches Message-ID: <20020802173449.N25761@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , gerg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3D4A27FE.8030801@snapgear.com> <20020802141652.E25761@suse.de> <3D4AA573.3000705@snapgear.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3D4AA573.3000705@snapgear.com>; from gerg@snapgear.com on Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 01:29:55AM +1000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 940 Lines: 28 On Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 01:29:55AM +1000, gerg wrote: > Yep, there sure is some crap in there :-) > Obviously left over from the original copy out > from arch/i386/config.in. > > I have cleaned all that silly stuff out for the > next patch. With the silly nits like that aside, it leaves just the more serious 'issues' such as those brought up by Willy earlier. The whole idea of a seperate mmnommu (or was it nommumm/ ?) directory seemed a bit odd-looking too. (Asides from the horrible name) I didn't check the code in detail, but is there really that little that can be shared between the regular mm/ ? Dave -- | Dave Jones. http://www.codemonkey.org.uk | SuSE Labs - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/