Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753959Ab1F3Tms (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:42:48 -0400 Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.124]:53220 "EHLO hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752076Ab1F3Tmq (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:42:46 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=PfPQ8rIoTcZsncbPZjVSZ7K0hy8Zc4hmL68r4VPNpKE= c=1 sm=0 a=EAdfuy46jrwA:10 a=5SG0PmZfjMsA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:17 a=lhy0CcDU6KOY1ANGMTEA:9 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=OPBmh+XkhLl+Enan7BmTLg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 67.242.120.143 Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] kprobes: Add separate preempt_disabling for kprobes From: Steven Rostedt To: Jason Baron Cc: LKML , Masami Hiramatsu , Peter Zijlstra , Frederic Weisbecker , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton In-Reply-To: <20110630194012.GB2457@redhat.com> References: <1309440213.26417.76.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <1309449117.26417.90.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> <20110630194012.GB2457@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15" Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2011 15:42:42 -0400 Message-ID: <1309462962.26417.112.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 627 Lines: 26 On Thu, 2011-06-30 at 15:40 -0400, Jason Baron wrote: > Since this is an issue for all arches, shouldn't this include the > transform: > > preempt_enable_no_resched() -> kprobe_preempt_enable() > > and > > preempt_disable() -> kprobe_preempt_disable() > > for all arches? > > Or, is that a follow-up patch? > I'm cross compiling all my changes as I type this ;) -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/