Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S129319AbQLPBFC>; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 20:05:02 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S129340AbQLPBEx>; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 20:04:53 -0500
Received: from thalia.fm.intel.com ([132.233.247.11]:64776 "EHLO
	thalia.fm.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S129319AbQLPBEg>; Fri, 15 Dec 2000 20:04:36 -0500
Message-ID: <D5E932F578EBD111AC3F00A0C96B1E6F07DBDE40@orsmsx31.jf.intel.com>
From: "Dunlap, Randy" <randy.dunlap@intel.com>
To: "'Borislav Deianov'" <borislav@ensim.com>, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: recommended build environment
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 16:33:37 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> From: Borislav Deianov [mailto:borislav@ensim.com]
> 
> In article <E146jNL-0000SN-00@the-village.bc.nu> you wrote:
> >> > o	We tell vendors to build RPMv3 , glibc 2.1.x
> >> Curious HOW do you tell vendors??
> 
> > When they ask. More usefully Dan Quinlann and most vendors 
> put together a
> > recommended set of things to build with and use. It warns 
> about library
> > pitfalls, kernel changes and what packaging is supported. 
> It is far from
> > perfect and nothing like the LSB goals but its a start and 
> following it does
> > give you applications that with a bit of care run on everything.
> 
> Is that recommendation available online anywhere? What about RedHat's?
> If not, who do I email for a copy in each case?

The Quinlan et al recommendations are at
http://www.freestandards.org/ldps/ .

~Randy

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/