Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756103Ab2BAJvP (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2012 04:51:15 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:31526 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753913Ab2BAJvN (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2012 04:51:13 -0500 Message-ID: <4F290BA8.9030606@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 17:53:44 +0800 From: Dave Young User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110323 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pekka Enberg CC: Wu Fengguang , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andrew Morton , Christoph Lameter Subject: Re: [PATCH] move vm tools from Documentation/vm/ to tools/ References: <20120201063420.GA10204@darkstar.nay.redhat.com> <4F28EC9D.7000907@redhat.com> <20120201083032.GA6774@localhost> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 966 Lines: 34 On 02/01/2012 04:44 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Wu Fengguang wrote: >> Will git-mv end up with a better commit? > > Just use > > git format-patch -C good idea, patch looks clean with -C. So there should be no much problem for review. Also because there's also Makefile changes, I want to still send as one patch with all changes. How do you think? > > to generate the patch and it should be fine. > >>> BTW, I think tools/slub/slabinfo.c should be included in tools/vm/ as >>> well, will move it in v2 patch >> >> CC Christoph. Maybe not a big deal since it's already under tools/. > > I'm certainly fine with moving it to tools/vm. -- Thanks Dave -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/