Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 15:24:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 15:24:10 -0400 Received: from smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.137]:34058 "EHLO smtpzilla1.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 15:24:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 21:27:32 +0200 (CEST) From: Roman Zippel X-X-Sender: roman@serv To: Linus Torvalds cc: David Woodhouse , David Howells , , Subject: Re: manipulating sigmask from filesystems and drivers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1314 Lines: 39 Hi On Fri, 2 Aug 2002, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Binary compatibility is important. As is the larger issue of generic UNIX > compatibility. You had better have some really strong arguments for why > you would think I'd be willing to break compatibility. So far you have had > _no_ arguments for the question "Why?". I never asked for breaking binary compatibility. On the other hand I can give you an example, why I'd like to have a choice. I expect from a good application that it recovers gracefully from failures, so if I'm saving a file and the server goes down, I would really, really like it if something happened when I push that stop button or I press Esc and the application should offer me the possibility to save the file somewhere else. To implement this I would suggest using file flags instead of new task flags: O_ATOMIC O_NONBLOCK O_SIGNALINT O_KILLINT O_DONT_BOTHER_ME The first one might be useful for aio, it wants something like that already anyway. This way applications had a choice, how read/write should behave on signals. bye, Roman - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/