Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753336Ab2BBAFB (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2012 19:05:01 -0500 Received: from helcar.apana.org.au ([209.40.204.226]:39108 "EHLO fornost.hengli.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753018Ab2BBAFA (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2012 19:05:00 -0500 Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 11:04:51 +1100 From: Herbert Xu To: Greg KH Cc: Alexey Dobriyan , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk Subject: Re: [06/20] crypto: sha512 - reduce stack usage to safe number Message-ID: <20120202000450.GA18441@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20120201210055.GA25374@kroah.com> <20120201201531.599621544@clark.kroah.org> <20120201234208.GA28700@p183.telecom.by> <20120201235204.GA18950@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120201235204.GA18950@kroah.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 852 Lines: 21 On Wed, Feb 01, 2012 at 03:52:04PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > But this patch isn't in Linus's tree yet, right? > > So, should I just drop this one for now (well both of them) or just wait > for the above referenced patch to hit Linus's tree and handle it then? We're still working on the i386 issue. However, I'd say that you should take these two patches now since the problem they fix is far worse than the potential stack issue on i386. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/