Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 17:54:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 17:54:08 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:62056 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 2 Aug 2002 17:54:08 -0400 From: Alan Cox Message-Id: <200208022157.g72Lv3G31399@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Subject: Re: Accelerating user mode linux To: jdike@karaya.com (Jeff Dike) Date: Fri, 2 Aug 2002 17:57:03 -0400 (EDT) Cc: alan@redhat.com (Alan Cox), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200208022233.RAA04165@ccure.karaya.com> from "Jeff Dike" at Aug 02, 2002 05:33:51 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 726 Lines: 13 > mmap, munmap, and mprotect by adding another argument, I'm not. I'm talking > about adding new syscalls, mmap2, munmap2, mprotect2 (or something more > imaginative), which have the extra argument, having them take -1 as meaning > "fiddle the current address space" and pursuading libc to use them instead > of the current syscalls. Then we would start the current ones on their way > to the happy syscall hunting grounds in the sky. Thats a lot more invasive than I want to be - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/