Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753927Ab2BDDVk (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2012 22:21:40 -0500 Received: from perches-mx.perches.com ([206.117.179.246]:42872 "EHLO labridge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750889Ab2BDDVj (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Feb 2012 22:21:39 -0500 Message-ID: <1328325697.21255.41.camel@joe2Laptop> Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Warn on code with 6+ tab indentation From: Joe Perches To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Andy Whitcroft , Ingo Molnar , Andrew Morton , Cyrill Gorcunov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Emelyanov , Serge Hallyn , KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki , Kees Cook , Tejun Heo , Andrew Vagin , "Eric W. Biederman" , Alexey Dobriyan , Andi Kleen , KOSAKI Motohiro , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Glauber Costa , Matt Helsley , Pekka Enberg , Eric Dumazet , Vasiliy Kulikov , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 19:21:37 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: <20120130140905.441199885@openvz.org> <20120130141852.309402052@openvz.org> <20120203074656.GC30543@elte.hu> <20120203083530.GD1968@moon> <20120203090929.GA23996@elte.hu> <20120203012241.bcd3d0c8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20120203095227.GA13162@elte.hu> <20120203100743.GA3334@elte.hu> <1328311239.21255.24.camel@joe2Laptop> <1328319226.21255.28.camel@joe2Laptop> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.2- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1418 Lines: 34 On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 19:09 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 5:33 PM, Joe Perches wrote: > > You liked the same premise, but a worse > > implementation, a couple years ago. > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2009/12/18/289 > I have grown to dislike debatable parts of checkpatch over the years, > which probably colors my reaction to things like this. > I'd prefer for checkpatch to check things that are fairly black-and-white. > >> Why? Because mindless checks like this would just lead to people > >> making things worse and intermixing spaces there instead. > > Can't happen. > > They'll get a different warning about mixing tabs > > and spaces or starting a line with spaces only. > Ok,. fair enough. That makes it more likely to work. > That said, I did a grep for six tabs, and we do seem to have quite a > bit of code like that. 67 _thousand_ lines just in C files, if I did > my grep right I think that's a bad test. It finds a _lot_ of line continuations. The right test is _only_ for 6 or more tabs followed by (if|for|while|do|else|switch) $ grep -rP --include=*.[ch] "^\t{6,}(if|for|while|do|else|switch)" * | \ wc -l 1509 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/