Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 3 Aug 2002 17:36:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 3 Aug 2002 17:36:30 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-022-101.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.22.101]:32189 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 3 Aug 2002 17:36:30 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Andrew Morton , Rik van Riel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Rmap speedup Date: Sat, 3 Aug 2002 23:41:24 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <3D4B692B.46817AD0@zip.com.au> <3D4C4E7A.C6707A4C@zip.com.au> In-Reply-To: <3D4C4E7A.C6707A4C@zip.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 685 Lines: 17 On Saturday 03 August 2002 23:43, Andrew Morton wrote: > > This could explain the fact that the locking overhead plummeted > > on Daniel's box while it didn't change at all on your machine. > > Oh it helped a bit. More in 2.4 than 2.5. Possibly I broke > Daniel's patch somehow. But even the improvement in 2.4 > from Daniel's patch is disappointing. What are the numbers for 2.4? Are they for my out-of-the-box patch? -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/