Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 3 Aug 2002 18:09:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 3 Aug 2002 18:09:51 -0400 Received: from parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk ([195.92.249.252]:20497 "EHLO www.linux.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 3 Aug 2002 18:09:50 -0400 Message-ID: <3D4C57BB.9D735B13@zip.com.au> Date: Sat, 03 Aug 2002 15:22:51 -0700 From: Andrew Morton X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.19-rc5 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Oliver Neukum CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: question on dup_task_struct References: <17b65z-1ERay0C@fmrl02.sul.t-online.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1114 Lines: 38 Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Hi, > > why is GFP_ATOMIC used in fork.c::dup_task_struct? Presumably so that the allocation of the task structure can dip into the emergency pools, giving fork a better chance of succeeding? We don't need to do that now - we can run page reclaim in there as well as dip into the emergency pools. fork.c | 5 +++-- 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- 2.5.30/kernel/fork.c~fork-alloc Sat Aug 3 15:19:10 2002 +++ 2.5.30-akpm/kernel/fork.c Sat Aug 3 15:19:54 2002 @@ -106,9 +106,10 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_stru struct thread_info *ti; ti = alloc_thread_info(); - if (!ti) return NULL; + if (!ti) + return NULL; - tsk = kmem_cache_alloc(task_struct_cachep,GFP_ATOMIC); + tsk = kmem_cache_alloc(task_struct_cachep, GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_HIGH); if (!tsk) { free_thread_info(ti); return NULL; . - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/