Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756511Ab2BGAjx (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2012 19:39:53 -0500 Received: from mail-iy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.210.174]:52522 "EHLO mail-iy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750911Ab2BGAjw (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Feb 2012 19:39:52 -0500 Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2012 16:39:48 -0800 From: Tejun Heo To: Shaohua Li Cc: Linus Torvalds , Vivek Goyal , Jens Axboe , lkml , Knut Petersen , mroos@linux.ee Subject: Re: [patch]block: fix ioc locking warning Message-ID: <20120207003948.GE21292@google.com> References: <1328514611.21268.66.camel@sli10-conroe> <20120206151219.GC30752@redhat.com> <4F2FFB21.9000202@kernel.dk> <20120206163721.GF30752@redhat.com> <20120206164428.GA21292@google.com> <20120206172706.GB21292@google.com> <20120206203604.GC21292@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 801 Lines: 21 Hello, On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 08:31:22AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote: > Since you are talking about performance, one of our microbenchmark (swap) > shows a regression. Alex bisect it to be b2efa05265d62bc2, which is related to > the ioc change. A little strange to me, don't expect such change can cause > performance issue. I haven't double check the issue, but if you have > ideas, please let me know. Hmmm... I think the only thing which can be made slower by that patch is ioc release (ie. task exits). What does the microbench do? Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/