Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756794Ab2BGKBL (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2012 05:01:11 -0500 Received: from mail.karo-electronics.de ([81.173.242.67]:58105 "EHLO mail.karo-electronics.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756555Ab2BGKBJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Feb 2012 05:01:09 -0500 Message-ID: <20272.63074.235023.783459@ipc1.ka-ro> Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 11:01:06 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Lothar_Wa=C3=9Fmann?= To: Yong Zhang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [BUG] genirq: Race condition in ONESHOT IRQ handler disabling IRQ forever In-Reply-To: <20120207090305.GB32736@zhy> References: <20271.35831.227679.177366@ipc1.ka-ro> <20120207090305.GB32736@zhy> X-Mailer: VM 8.1.0 under 23.2.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1892 Lines: 47 Hi, > On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 09:14:47AM +0100, Lothar Waßmann wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I already sent this to on Feb. 1, 2012 > > but did not get any response there. So resending to a wider audience > > with improved subject line: > > > > there is a race condition in the threaded IRQ handler code for oneshot > > interrupts that may lead to disabling an IRQ indefinitely. IRQs are > > masked before calling the hard-irq handler and are unmasked only after > > the soft-irq handler has been run. Thus if the hard-irq handler > > returns IRQ_HANDLED instead of IRQ_WAKE_THREAD, meaning the soft-irq > > will not be called, the interrupt will remain masked forever. > > > > This can happen due to a short pulse on the interrupt line, that > > triggers the interrupt logic, but goes undetected by the hard-irq > > handler. The problem can be reproduced with the TSC2007 touch > > controller driver that uses ONESHOT interrupts. > > Isn't it the responsibility of the driver (say TSC2007)? > > In this case, TSC2007 should return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD IMHO. > That would mean it had to return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD unconditionally making the return code useless. And it would cause an extra useless loop through the softirq handler. Lothar Waßmann -- ___________________________________________________________ Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstraße 22 | D - 52076 Aachen Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10 Geschäftsführer: Matthias Kaussen Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996 www.karo-electronics.de | info@karo-electronics.de ___________________________________________________________ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/