Message-ID: <1328630942.2200.80.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3][RFC] tracing/rcu: Add _rcuidle() tracepoint to
 handle rcu_idle_exit() tracepoints
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>,
        Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>, Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
        Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2012 11:09:02 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20120207153710.GQ5941@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <20120207145653.829892056@goodmis.org>
	 <20120207153710.GQ5941@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 691
Lines: 18

On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 07:37 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> Please note that the __rcudle() tracepoints depend on patch #45 from
> my series (https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/3/471), though only for code
> containing tracepoints that are called both from idle and non-idle.
> I believe that the tracepoints in this patch series are only invoked
> from idle, so should be no problem.

Right, as I tested these without your patch series.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/