Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 11:43:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 11:43:15 -0400 Received: from pc-62-30-255-50-az.blueyonder.co.uk ([62.30.255.50]:11427 "EHLO kushida.apsleyroad.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 11:42:23 -0400 Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 16:45:23 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier To: Brian Gerst Cc: Linus Torvalds , Linux-Kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Dead code in i386/kernel/process.c Message-ID: <20020804164523.A3970@kushida.apsleyroad.org> References: <3D4C5B8E.5060009@quark.didntduck.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3D4C5B8E.5060009@quark.didntduck.org>; from bgerst@quark.didntduck.org on Sat, Aug 03, 2002 at 06:39:10PM -0400 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 624 Lines: 17 Brian Gerst wrote: > This patch removes an artifact of code left over from the 2.0 days when > the kernel didn't use flat segments. This code dates back to a patch for 1.2.8 :-) The comment is quite wrong now. Can we trust that arch/i386/mm/init.c will continue to map the page at 0xc0000000 (PAGE_OFFSET) to physical address 0? I guess so, hence the patch is fine. -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/