Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757891Ab2BHXyP (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2012 18:54:15 -0500 Received: from lennier.cc.vt.edu ([198.82.162.213]:42788 "EHLO lennier.cc.vt.edu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757796Ab2BHXyM (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2012 18:54:12 -0500 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.2 01/07/2005 with nmh-1.3-dev To: David Howells Cc: jmorris@namei.org, keyrings@linux-nfs.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Define ENOAUTHSERVICE to indicate "Authentication service unavailable" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:29:05 GMT." <20120208122905.8902.65762.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu References: <20120208122905.8902.65762.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1328745230_2846P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:53:50 -0500 Message-ID: <22934.1328745230@turing-police.cc.vt.edu> X-Mirapoint-Received-SPF: 198.82.161.152 auth3.smtp.vt.edu Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu 2 pass X-Junkmail-Status: score=10/50, host=zidane.cc.vt.edu X-Junkmail-Signature-Raw: score=unknown, refid=str=0001.0A020204.4F330B0F.0038,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2011-07-25 19:15:43, dmn=2011-05-27 18:58:46, mode=single engine X-Junkmail-IWF: false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1657 Lines: 42 --==_Exmh_1328745230_2846P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:29:05 GMT, David Howells said: > +#define ENOAUTHSERVICE 139 /* Authentication service not available */ > > #define EHWPOISON 139 /* Memory page has hardware error */ Was this an intentional overload of 139 (and so on for other archs)? Just checking - I'm sure if it goes in like this, we'll see a patch to "fix" the collision for 3.16.0 or so... ;) --==_Exmh_1328745230_2846P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iQIVAwUBTzMLDgdmEQWDXROgAQLo8w/9GSAkuhd+TKRP7GBY/vtnzb8/kyvEnJ5M kXAsV/k12ZKsyRo+qat0scVkIIVR+siFVQMBMAOE4r4Y14CGYMInhrpsNLa0vhqK GdS5+GNIAbHj8PBJSYxxHffiQisePTTbAppzW68to/jRe3eYcWQdlJgcjdOMYSKJ TxLJi7R36FNZAMW5C6VjrEZcWym+LOizeSuX0a4hGMkWbo1D6YO/bsqI0703fhh3 +q3n6KLZahVNZQ4zNDtIuznUgm/SEWnz5kyZF+Lj0pCxCC/00Qtl0d47YGQ8Bfcr 6v+v2loI96oHJypLbPOoovwqpPV5YUoiaLS+aKFyEcMb+Soa8kSpPSkb+lkQZ/eK FTkdLuRFQ4cK9Dk1mqFa94x7XsVv6FfXt4NUKuWSm2cqEzUbdEbmXsdwT69oMcYV aYd//3xYcjtcwDi+lovc7THYIj2UJYtZVxIeZpitxISMdAJ+gZEYzmgDKF+O4IDj DYdnO8PVMfdosULrhP5GpYtjYJ0vL/HSNXSkGtJ/OWIlBIBFl2yXtOpzkjqndtBE WBmmfQHvSNjYU5Ab/udNYNoT4+rEKkkBLTtbWwFvgNPiiE5PLYLrUrdyqz4Y6KAb B9OkVk4AWq0UlCeNCl2onHKdsT61rfImD8wygJyJ2oau7TWw4itQE2LV/pLQY68T HrD/BwmIDcY= =h9rq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1328745230_2846P-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/