Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757907Ab2BIAct (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2012 19:32:49 -0500 Received: from mail-bk0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:40289 "EHLO mail-bk0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757157Ab2BIAcr (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Feb 2012 19:32:47 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 04:32:43 +0400 From: Anton Vorontsov To: Vincent Guittot Cc: Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Dave Jones , Russell King , Oleg Nesterov , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , "Paul E. McKenney" , Nicolas Pitre , Mike Chan , Todd Poynor , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] cpufreq: New 'interactive' governor Message-ID: <20120209003243.GA24602@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> References: <20120208013959.GA24535@panacea> <20120208014437.GC459@panacea> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1329 Lines: 34 Hello Vincent, On Wed, Feb 08, 2012 at 03:00:59PM -0800, Vincent Guittot wrote: > Have you got some figures which shows the improvement of the > responsivness compared to other governor like the ondemand one ? > That could be interesting to test interactive governor with > cpufreq-bench and compare the results with ondemand ? I don't have any numbers handy, but no doubt the governor brings some improvements which you can see on a real device. Anyway, the point of sending out these RFC patches was to get a technical review of the approach, because there's no much point in pushing the code that isn't acceptable on technical merits, no matter how better numbers it might give. And scheduler folks aren't happy on the whole approach, so I guess we should go back to the drawing board. :-) Thanks, p.s. Sure, in the end we'll have to measure 'interactive' vs. 'ondemand' vs. 'newapproach'. And maybe now it's time to actually measure 'interactive' governor in numbers... I'll get back to this thread when I get the numbers. -- Anton Vorontsov Email: cbouatmailru@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/