Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 14:41:21 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 14:41:21 -0400 Received: from garrincha.netbank.com.br ([200.203.199.88]:25863 "HELO garrincha.netbank.com.br") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 14:41:20 -0400 Date: Sun, 4 Aug 2002 15:44:37 -0300 (BRT) From: Rik van Riel X-X-Sender: riel@imladris.surriel.com To: Hans Reiser cc: Andreas Gruenbacher , Linus Torvalds , Alan Cox , Marcelo Tosatti , lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH] Caches that shrink automatically In-Reply-To: <3D4D72EB.7000809@namesys.com> Message-ID: X-spambait: aardvark@kernelnewbies.org X-spammeplease: aardvark@nl.linux.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 870 Lines: 25 On Sun, 4 Aug 2002, Hans Reiser wrote: > Rik van Riel wrote: > > >Nope, the idea is to push all caches according to size, but > >often-used caches should shrink less than caches that are > >hardly ever used. > > Do you let the subcache decide how to move the aging hand and track it? > Have I convinced you of that one yet? Or is it still page based? Linus has indicated that he would like to have it page based, but implementation issues point towards letting the subcache manage its objects by itself ;) Rik -- Bravely reimplemented by the knights who say "NIH". http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/