Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758033Ab2BIQGe (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2012 11:06:34 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:11944 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752843Ab2BIQGd (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2012 11:06:33 -0500 Message-ID: <4F33EEB3.4080807@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:05:07 +0200 From: Avi Kivity User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frederic Weisbecker CC: "Paul E. McKenney" , Christoph Lameter , Peter Zijlstra , Gilad Ben-Yossef , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chris Metcalf , linux-mm@kvack.org, Pekka Enberg , Matt Mackall , Sasha Levin , Rik van Riel , Andi Kleen , Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Michal Nazarewicz , Kosaki Motohiro , Milton Miller Subject: Re: [v7 0/8] Reduce cross CPU IPI interference References: <20120201201336.GI2382@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F2A58A1.90800@redhat.com> <20120202153437.GD2518@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F2AB66C.2030309@redhat.com> <20120202170134.GM2518@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F2AC69B.7000704@redhat.com> <20120202175155.GV2518@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4F2E7311.8060808@redhat.com> <20120205165927.GH2467@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20120209152155.GA22552@somewhere.redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20120209152155.GA22552@somewhere.redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1462 Lines: 33 On 02/09/2012 05:22 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > > > > > Looks like there are new rcu_user_enter() and rcu_user_exit() APIs which > > > we can use. Hopefully they subsume rcu_virt_note_context_switch() so we > > > only need one set of APIs. > > > > Now that you mention it, that is a good goal. However, it requires > > coordination with Frederic's code as well, so some investigation > > is required. Bad things happen if you tell RCU you are idle when you > > really are not and vice versa! > > > > Thanx, Paul > > > > Right. Avi I need to know more about what you need. rcu_virt_note_context_switch() > notes a quiescent state while rcu_user_enter() shuts down RCU (it's in fact the same > thing than rcu_idle_enter() minus the is_idle_cpu() checks). I don't know enough about RCU to say if it's okay or not (I typically peek at the quick quiz answers). However, switching to guest mode is very similar to exiting to user mode: we're guaranteed not to be in an rcu critical section, and to remain so until the guest exits back to us. What guarantees does rcu_user_enter() provide? With luck guest entry satisifies them all. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/