Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 22:37:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 22:37:46 -0400 Received: from verdi.et.tudelft.nl ([130.161.38.158]:32136 "EHLO verdi.et.tudelft.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 4 Aug 2002 22:37:46 -0400 Message-Id: <200208050241.g752fBC12491@verdi.et.tudelft.nl> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.4 06/23/2000 with nmh-1.0.4 X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: linux-kernel To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robn@verdi.et.tudelft.nl Subject: Re: 2.4.19 IDE Partition Check issue In-Reply-To: Your message of "04 Aug 2002 19:28:54 BST." <1028485734.14196.45.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 04:41:10 +0200 From: Rob van Nieuwkerk Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 973 Lines: 27 Alan wrote: > The Promise stuff is fixed in -ac and was exactly this issue. LBA48 is > not supported by the earlier promise controllers. The highpoint may well Hi Alan, I planned to do a massive disk replace/relocate action on my machines soon and part of the plan is having a 160GB Maxtor in some machines. Got scared by statement above .. :-) I got myself a 2.4.19-ac3 tree, looked around in the IDE code and wasn't able to find the answer for my questions: Any chance of lba48 working on a: - Promise Ultra66 (PDC20262: chipset revision 1) ? - Intel 82371AB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01) (On P-III BX-chipset mobo) ? - Intel 82371FB PIIX IDE [Triton I] (rev 02) (On P-I Triton I mobo) ? greetings, Rob van Nieuwkerk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/