Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751350Ab2BMFUZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:20:25 -0500 Received: from mail-tul01m020-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:65447 "EHLO mail-tul01m020-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751262Ab2BMFUV convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 00:20:21 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <4F30E19B.9020503@intel.com> <4F310529.4020101@intel.com> <4F31B789.9020509@samsung.com> <15D4F59C-7AFA-456E-8A5F-9E11EE9B9717@marvell.com> <4B11A480-8122-4A0B-A0EE-E1E95477F985@marvell.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:20:21 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: mmc sdhci mmcblk0: error -110 sending status command, retrying From: Jeff Chua To: Philip Rakity Cc: Jaehoon Chung , Chris Ball , Pierre Ossman , lkml , "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" , "arindam.nath@amd.com" , "zhangfei.gao@gmail.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1565 Lines: 50 On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Jeff Chua wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:41 PM, Jeff Chua wrote: >> I ran tests for frequency that works dd out 1G of data from 8MHz to >> 16MHz, and it seems frequency less than 8.4MHz can only transfer at >> rate of 14.3MB/s and above 8.4MHz, speed goes up to 18.3 MB/s. Above >> 17MHz, errors encounters. >> >> hz1 ?8000000 ?73.5029 s ?14.3 MB/s >> hz2 ?8000000 ?73.4740 s ?14.3 MB/s >> hz3 ?8000000 ?73.3982 s ?14.3 MB/s >> hz1 ?8200000 ?71.9677 s ?14.6 MB/s >> hz2 ?8200000 ?73.4936 s ?14.3 MB/s >> hz3 ?8200000 ?73.3462 s ?14.3 MB/s >> hz1 ?8400000 ?56.6296 s ?18.5 MB/s >> hz2 ?8400000 ?56.7616 s ?18.5 MB/s >> hz3 ?8400000 ?56.7926 s ?18.5 MB/s >> hz1 ?8600000 ?56.6622 s ?18.5 MB/s >> hz2 ?8600000 ?56.7201 s ?18.5 MB/s >> hz3 ?8600000 ?56.6476 s ?18.5 MB/s >> hz1 ?8800000 ?56.8846 s ?18.4 MB/s >> hz2 ?8800000 ?56.8226 s ?18.5 MB/s >> hz3 ?8800000 ?56.7070 s ?18.5 MB/s > > I've turned on write, and there's no error writing. But speed is > slower than accessing it via USB2 SD card reader. Same SD. > Via SD PCI 18.779 sec ?4.04 %cpu Via USB2.0 Card Reader 12.205 sec 2.04 %cpu Via USB3.0 Card Reader 11.427 sec 2.01 %cpu Shouldn't PCI SD be faster? Same SD used for all tests. THanks, Jeff Thanks, Jeff -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/