Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757254Ab2BMQtK (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:49:10 -0500 Received: from mailhub.sw.ru ([195.214.232.25]:27585 "EHLO relay.sw.ru" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755149Ab2BMQtH (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:49:07 -0500 Message-ID: <4F393EE7.4050805@parallels.com> Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:48:39 +0400 From: Stanislav Kinsbursky User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.26) Gecko/20120131 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.18 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Serge Hallyn CC: Casey Schaufler , "akpm@linux-foundation.org" , "jmorris@namei.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "criu@openvz.org" , "linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org" , "viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk" , "eparis@parisplace.org" , "sds@tycho.nsa.gov" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] IPC: checkpoint/restore in userspace enhancements References: <20120209175043.24392.62810.stgit@localhost6.localdomain6> <4F356206.1080509@schaufler-ca.com> <4F38EE17.7090809@parallels.com> <20120213161135.GE5009@sergelap> In-Reply-To: <20120213161135.GE5009@sergelap> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1414 Lines: 34 13.02.2012 20:11, Serge Hallyn пишет: > Quoting Stanislav Kinsbursky (skinsbursky@parallels.com): >> 10.02.2012 22:29, Casey Schaufler пишет: >>> On 2/9/2012 10:01 AM, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: >>>> This patch set aimed to provide additional functionality for all IPC objects, >>>> which is required for migration these objects by user-space checkpoint/restore >>>> utils. >>>> The main problem here was impossibility to set up object id. This patch set >>>> solves the problem in two steps: >>>> 1) Makes it possible to create new object (shared memory, semaphores set or >>>> messages queue) with ID, equal to passed key. >>>> 2) Makes it possible to change existent object key. >>> >>> Is there any chance you might include the LSM data as well? >>> >> >> Sorry, but I don't understand your question. >> What is this "LSM"? Linux Shared Memory? If yes, and you mean SYSV >> IPC SHM, then where do you want to include it? > > He means linux security modules. (see include/linux/security.h) Ok, thanks for explanation. Casey, what exactly you are asking about? Am I going to implement security_*_set() functions? -- Best regards, Stanislav Kinsbursky -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/