MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20120213201522.GA23907@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
References: <20120213201522.GA23907@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:29:00 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyT3NAaOFB7UyaJMDX0U-GzZgqJe1a_wPrgmn6TO0=8WQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] battery-urgent.git
To: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
        Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1173
Lines: 28

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Anton Vorontsov
<cbouatmailru@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Let's try requesting pull via the signed tag thing...

Well, it works, but your key currently isn't signed by *anybody*, so
right now it is a bit pointless.

That said, if you get it signed by more people in the future, the
signature that stays around in the kernel will become more meaningful
than it is today.

Qnd even in the absence of that, any future pushes using the same key
will obviously show that the git tree is controlled by somebody who
has access to that same key. So a gpg signature has *some* meaning
even when there is no external sign of trust, but it really is not
nearly as meaningful as it could be.

I don't know where you are physically, but we've got a fairly
geographically wide set of keys these days, so I think it should be
possible to get that key signed by some relevant people.. Hmm?

                   Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/