Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754815Ab2BNP4j (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:56:39 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:37557 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750887Ab2BNP4h (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 10:56:37 -0500 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <1329219673-28711-21-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org> References: <1329219673-28711-21-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org> <1329219673-28711-1-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org> To: Matt Fleming Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Matt Fleming , Koichi Yasutake , Al Viro , linux-am33-list@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/40] mn10300: Use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask() Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:56:16 +0000 Message-ID: <17603.1329234976@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 668 Lines: 19 Matt Fleming wrote: > asmlinkage long sys_sigsuspend(int history0, int history1, old_sigset_t mask) > { > - mask &= _BLOCKABLE; > - spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock); > + sigset_t blocked; > + > current->saved_sigmask = current->blocked; Can this line create a race, now that it's not protected by a lock? It is possible for current->blocked to get altered by another thread. David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/