Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761362Ab2BOAy4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:54:56 -0500 Received: from rcsinet15.oracle.com ([148.87.113.117]:18294 "EHLO rcsinet15.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755651Ab2BOAyy convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Feb 2012 19:54:54 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 16:54:37 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Magenheimer To: Greg KH Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Seth Jennings , Nitin Gupta , Konrad Wilk Subject: RE: linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree References: <20120210155800.ccef418fd5c2f2b87a5d6315@canb.auug.org.au> <20120210052947.GA2068@kroah.com> <80f07411-179e-4fe9-b591-32fbcaac414b@default> <20120210174359.GB5128@kroah.com> <443c718c-643b-4b48-9dd8-e0424fc0afa9@default> <20120215000358.GA27341@kroah.com> In-Reply-To: <20120215000358.GA27341@kroah.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Oracle Beehive Extensions for Outlook 2.0.1.6 (510070) [OL 12.0.6607.1000 (x86)] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-Source-IP: ucsinet22.oracle.com [156.151.31.94] X-CT-RefId: str=0001.0A090208.4F3B0256.0001,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1471 Lines: 35 > From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@linuxfoundation.org] > Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the staging tree > > > > Ok, now reverted, what a mess... > > > > > > greg k-h > > > > OK, I have just posted the ramster v5 patchset which applies against > > linux-3.2. I've test-built it against linux-next... it only gets > > the normal minor merge conflicts for adding a line to > > drivers/staging/Makefile and Kconfig. > > Please resend after fixing that conflict, as it would require me to edit > it by hand in order to apply this. As you have already redone the > patch, there's no reason I should have to do this, right? OK. I'm not quite sure how to generate a patchset or a git commit-set that applies cleanly against two different trees (3.2 and linux-next), but I guess common sense should tell me that, since the patches have to go through staging-next first and you are applying patches rather than git-pull'ing, staging-next should be my preferred choice for a base. Do you want me to resend all 6 patches? The only patch affected is patch 6 of 6. All others apply cleanly. Let me know and I will resend one or all tomorrow. Sorry for the noise/hassle, but this is a learning process... Dan -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/